How does cultural relativism differ from ethnocentrism?

Cultural relativism asserts that no culture is superior to another and that cultural practices should be evaluated based on their own values and standards rather than through the lens of an outsider's culture. This perspective encourages an understanding and appreciation of diverse cultural practices, promoting the idea that cultures have their unique complexities and rationalities.

By recognizing that each culture operates within its own context, cultural relativism fosters a more nuanced view of human behavior and societal norms. This contrasts sharply with ethnocentrism, which holds that one’s own culture is the standard by which others should be judged, often leading to the belief that other cultures are inferior or flawed.

The other options do not accurately convey the essence of cultural relativism. For instance, stating that it asserts all cultures are inherently flawed directly contradicts the principle of cultural relativism. Similarly, focusing solely on Western cultures or dismissing the value of cultural practices are both inconsistent with the premise that seeks to understand and respect different cultural contexts.